Pale Moon is developed to take advantage of newer processors in a very significant manner. For example, where Waterfox caters solely to 64-bit operating systems, Pale Moon provides optimized builds for both 32-bit and 64-bit versions of Windows as well as axing unnecessary extras, such as accessibility and parental control capabilities. Today, we look at competing project called Pale Moon, which is another Firefox derivative.Īlthough the goals and objectives of Pale Moon are quite similar to an offshoot like Waterfox, developer priorities for features beyond core functionality are different. Pale Moonįor instance, a browser I reviewed in April of 2012 called Waterfox is a special 64-bit Windows optimized build of Firefox which is said to improve upon performance and efficiency. On a higher level, however, there are projects that are considered offshoots of open source mainline browsers like Firefox and Chrome that apply their own twists and special sauce, all the while keeping a major bulk of the engine underneath mostly the same. We have browser choices in addition to the standard fare of Firefox, Opera, Internet Explorer, and Chrome. With the recent news about Google’s switch to the Blink engine and Mozilla experimenting with a multi-core optimized Firefox engine called Servo, there is quite a bit of change on the horizon for under-the-hood technologies that power the browsers we love.

Matt Nawrocki takes a look at an optimized web browser that may not be as optimized as advertised. Review: Pale Moon web browser for Windows

Pale moon standard